Sam Altman· @sama · X·· 2026-07-12精选AI 评分68
AI 导读
OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.6 系列在医疗领域的评估结果。最小变体 GPT-5.6 Luna 在最低推理强度下即超越最高推理强度的 GPT-5.5,且成本低 25 倍;最大变体 GPT-5.6 Sol 树立新标杆。在涵盖患者端与临床端的多样化任务中,专科医生被要求以无限时间和网络访问权限撰写回答,随后由其他医生盲评。评估基于准确性、沟通、完整性、指令遵循及健康决策帮助性五个维度,共 20000 次评分。结果显示,所有 GPT-5.6 模型表现均显著优于医生,且医生发现 GPT-5.6 回答中的缺陷少于医生自己撰写的回答。
推荐理由
GPT-5.6 在医疗任务上被医生评价比真人医生缺陷更少, 这是AI辅助诊断的分水岭, 产品人和医疗从业者值得看具体数据。
正文 · 原文
"physicians found fewer flaws in GPT-5.6 responses than physician-written responses."
♥️ GPT-5.6 is a major step forward for health, both at the frontier and at cost. These models push the frontier of performance per dollar, bringing the best health intelligence to all. The smallest variant, GPT-5.6 Luna, evaluated at the lowest reasoning effort, outperforms GPT-5.5 at the highest reasoning effort–despite costing 25x less. The largest variant, GPT-5.6 Sol, sets a new high bar at cost. Another especially cool result: physicians found fewer flaws in GPT-5.6 responses than physician-written responses. We collected diverse tasks that remain difficult for recent OpenAI models, across patient-facing and clinician-facing use cases. We asked speciality-matched physicians to write responses to these tasks with unlimited time and web access. We then asked other physicians to compare responses side-by-side, blinded to their source. Physicians were asked to comment on areas of improvement across five axes: accuracy, communication, completeness, instruction following, and health decision helpfulness. We then reported the fraction of responses across sources rated perfectly across all axes, across 20,000 total axis ratings. GPT-5.6 Sol appeared strongest, although all GPT-5.6 models performed significantly better than physicians.在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:Sam Altman · x.com