跳到正文
北京时间
原文
OpenAI:官网动态·· 1 天前精选AI 评分86

OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Terra,主打高效计算机操作与更低成本

Introducing GPT-6.1 Terra

AI 导读

OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Terra,定位快速高效的计算机使用与视觉推理模型,标准 API 定价比 GPT-5.6 Terra 和 GPT-6.1 Sol 低 50%,为每百万输入 token $1、缓存输入 $0.05、输出 $5。

推荐理由

官方公布了 GPT-6.1 Terra 在电脑操作、编码和成本上的具体数据与定价,便于开发者评估高吞吐任务是否值得迁移。

正文 · 原文

GPT-6.1 Terra

Delivering fast and capable computer use at scale

A 30-second introduction to GPT-6.1 Terra.

Video 1

We’re introducing GPT-6.1 Terra, a fast, efficient model that combines detailed visual reasoning and precise computer use alongside clearer, more natural writing. A significant step up from GPT‑5.6 Terra, it excels at the communication and computer-based tasks that fill the workday, from drafting proposals and interpreting technical drawings to filling out forms and editing videos.

Terra continues to advance the cost-intelligence frontier across our model families, providing a new balance of speed, capability, and cost. Its standard API prices are 50% lower than those of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol, making it practical for developers to automate high-volume work, like reading incoming invoices and entering their details into accounting software. In ChatGPT Work and Codex, your plan goes further with GPT-6.1 Terra—the same usage allowance covers more tasks than with GPT‑5.6 Terra and substantially more than with GPT‑6.1 Sol or GPT‑6 Astra.

From visual understanding to action

We measured GPT-6.1 Terra’s computer-use capabilities on Agents’ Last Exam, a benchmark of professional tasks that includes turning architectural drawings into a 3D model and reviewing an animated film shot by shot to create a time-coded log for a restoration team. At medium reasoning effort, GPT-6.1 Terra scores 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra at about one-third the cost. It even performs on par with GPT-6 Astra at only one-tenth its price per token. At max effort, Terra is over three times as token efficient as Claude Opus 5.5, and one-fourth its price per token, resulting in a ~9x lower cost per task. Terra is also much quicker, completing tasks over three times faster than both GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.

Agents’ Last Exam v1

GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Luna

Claude Opus 5.5

On MMMU-Pro, a benchmark of visual reasoning, GPT-6.1 Terra outperforms GPT-5.6 Terra at every reasoning setting. It even nearly matches the scores of our most capable frontier model, GPT-6 Astra, and GPT-6.1 Sol at much lower cost.

MMMU-Pro (Vision)

GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Luna

OSWorld 2.1 tests how well AI agents use desktop apps to complete multistep tasks, such as building a 3D model from a technical drawing. At medium reasoning effort, GPT-6.1 Terra surpasses GPT-5.6 Terra’s best score at a fraction of the cost per task.

A significant step up on factuality and coding

This year, we’ve invested heavily in reducing hallucinations and factual errors produced by our models. On our internal benchmark of error-inducing prompts, the error rate at low reasoning effort fell from 53.6% with GPT-5.6 Terra to 16.7% with GPT-6.1 Terra, a drop of nearly 37 percentage points. At maximum effort, the error rate fell by 18 percentage points to 4.3%, nearly matching the rates for GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.

GPT-6.1 Terra marks a substantial improvement over GPT-5.6 Terra for software engineering. Terminal-Bench 4.0 tests how well coding agents solve problems from the command line, such as fixing a webpage whose layout shifts as it loads. At maximum reasoning effort, GPT‑6.1 Terra solves 50.3% of tasks, more than double GPT‑5.6 Terra’s published score of 21.5%. For the most complex coding tasks, GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra remain the better choice.

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 tests how well agents use code to carry out scientific research tasks, such as tracking cell divisions in a time-lapse video. At max reasoning, GPT-6.1 Terra surpasses GPT-6.1 Sol at lower cost, coming within five points of Opus 5.5 at less than one-fifth the estimated cost.

Safety and alignment

As we make powerful AI more efficient and accessible, we continue training, testing, and refining our safeguards. GPT‑6.1 Terra meets the Critical threshold in cybersecurity under our Preparedness Framework, and maintains the protections developed for GPT‑6 Astra.

GPT-6.1 Terra brings with it the alignment improvements of the GPT-6 series. According to our evaluations, GPT-6.1 Terra is more likely to stay within scope and honestly disclose limitations and potential blockers to the user compared to GPT-5.6 Terra. In our prompt-injection tests, GPT-6.1 Terra also showed strong resistance to malicious instructions designed to divert it from the user’s task. More detail is available in the system card⁠(opens in a new window).

Pricing and availability

Starting today, GPT-6.1 Terra is available to all Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex. Developers can also access it through the OpenAI API as gpt-6.1-terra.

Standard API pricing is $1 per million input tokens, $0.05 per million cached input tokens, and $5 per million output tokens.

Author

OpenAI

Research

Latest Advancements

Safety

Products

API Platform

Business

Developers

Company

Support

More

Terms & Policies

(opens in a new window)(opens in a new window)(opens in a new window)(opens in a new window)(opens in a new window)(opens in a new window)(opens in a new window)

OpenAI © 2015–2026 Your privacy choices

English United States

来源:OpenAI:官网动态 · openai.com